USPTO serial 73532626
ALL PRO
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- TINGLEY, JOHN
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with ALL PRO?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
MICHAEL J. STRIKER
MICHAEL J STRIKER STRIKER, STRIKER & STENBY360 LEXINGTON AVENEW YORK, NY 10017UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | POWER TOOLS, NAMELY, ELECTRIC DRILLS, ROTARY HAMMERS, SCREW DRIVERS, GRINDERS, POLISHERS, SHEARS, WRENCHES, CIRCULAR AND RECIPROCATING SAWS, JIGSAWS, SANDERS, AND HEDGE TRIMMERS | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 7, 1989 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jul 31, 1989 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Jul 31, 1989 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Apr 3, 1989 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Dec 27, 1988 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Nov 30, 1988 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Nov 26, 1988 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Sep 16, 1988 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 25, 1988 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 8, 1988 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 16, 1988 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 17, 1987 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 9, 1987 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 7, 1987 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 4, 1987 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 11, 1987 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 31, 1986 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 10, 1986 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Jun 23, 1986 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Mar 5, 1986 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 6, 1986 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 20, 1985 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 26, 1985 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 25, 1985 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |