USPTO serial 73532743
TECHNOSOFT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Oct 12, 1993
- Examiner
- ERSKINE KATHRYN
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with TECHNOSOFT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
SASEBO-SHI, NAGASAKI-KEN, JP
SASEBO-SHI, NAGASAKI-KEN, JP
SASEBO-SHI, NAGASAKI-KEN, JP
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
DALE H. THIEL
DALE H THIEL FLYNN, THIEL, BOUTELL & TANIS, PC2026 RAMBLING RDKALAMAZOO, MI 49008-1699UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | COMPUTER PROGRAMS | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 17, 2004 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Sep 28, 1999 | 8.OK | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED | The USPTO accepted your Section 8 declaration showing the mark is still in use in commerce (or excusable nonuse). This satisfies the six-year maintenance requirement and keeps the registration active until the next renewal deadline. |
| May 26, 1999 | 8.AF | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) FILED | — |
| Oct 12, 1993 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jul 20, 1993 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 18, 1993 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| May 3, 1993 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 5, 1993 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 5, 1993 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 7, 1993 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 17, 1992 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 3, 1992 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 23, 1991 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 22, 1991 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 6, 1991 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 27, 1990 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 20, 1990 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 3, 1990 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 19, 1989 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 5, 1989 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 19, 1989 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 13, 1988 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 27, 1988 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 7, 1988 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 2, 1987 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 14, 1987 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 23, 1987 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 18, 1986 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 6, 1986 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 13, 1985 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 30, 1985 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |