USPTO serial 73532748
MAGNACELL
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- GLYNN, GERALD
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with MAGNACELL?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
MARKHAM, ONTARIO, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
ROBERT F. DELBRIDGE
ROBERT F DELBRIDGE GOWLING & HENDERSON2 FIRST CANADIAN PL STE 2400TORONTO, ON M5X 1A4CANADAGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | ELECTRICAL BATTERIES FOR MOTOR VEHICLES | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 27, 1990 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 6, 1989 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 23, 1989 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 12, 1989 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 13, 1988 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 23, 1988 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 25, 1988 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 1, 1988 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 17, 1987 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 2, 1987 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 2, 1987 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 22, 1986 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 4, 1986 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 5, 1986 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 31, 1985 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 30, 1985 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |