USPTO serial 73532770
TAG
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- JUDGE, CONNIE M.
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with TAG?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
LAWRENCE G. KURLAND
LAWRENCE G KURLAND HUBBELL, COHEN, STIEFEL & GROSS, PC551 FIFTH AVENEW YORK, NY 10176UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | INTEGRATED TURNKEY COMPUTER SYSTEMS, NAMELY COMPUTERS, VIDEO DISPLAY TERMINALS, , PRINTERS, MODEMS, AND COMPUTER PROGRAMS | ABANDONED | Jan 1, 1971 |
| 042 | INSTALLING, MAINTAINING AND PROVIDING INTERACTIVE ONLINE ACCESS TO, COMPUTER DATABASES, SYSTEMS, AND COMPUTER PROGRAMS IN THE FIELDS OF PAYROLL SERVICES, INVENTORY CONTROL, GENERAL LEDGER, JOB COSTING, ORDER ENTRY, INVOICING, ACCOUNTS PAYABLE AND RECEIVABLE, SCHOOL APPROPRIATIONS, BUS SCHEDULES, CENSUS AND ATTENDANCE REPORTING, LEASE TRACKING AND ACCOUNTING, REAL ESTATE BILLING, SHOPPING CENTER BILLING, AND MISCELLANEOUS BUSINESS SERVICES--NAMELY SALESMENS' COMMISSIONS, RENT INVOICING, AND DELIVERY ROUTE ACCOUNTING; INSTALLING, MAINTAINING, AND PROVIDING COMPUTER HARDWARE | ABANDONED | Mar 1, 1970 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 29, 1989 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 1, 1989 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 3, 1987 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 16, 1987 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 13, 1987 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 20, 1986 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 17, 1986 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 30, 1985 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |