Drawing for ADRIATIC

USPTO serial 73533722

ADRIATIC

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 1465693Status 710
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Nov 17, 1987
Examiner
—
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.

Status 710: Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active.

Need help with ADRIATIC?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

SIMOR L. MOSKOWITZ

DIANNE M CAMELO LEVY & STOPOL, LLPE TWR 14TH FL 190 EAB PLZUNIONDALE, NY 11556-0190UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
029PROCESSED FISH, PROCESSED PEPPER, JAMS, FRUITS IN SYRUP, PICKLES AND FRUIT SYRUPS USED AS TOPPINGS NAMELY, RASPBERRY, BLACKBERRY, BLACK CURRANT, ORANGE AND SOUR CHERRYSECTION 8 - CANCELLED—
032FRUITS SYRUPS USED IN THE PREPARATION OF FRUIT JUICE DRINKS NAMELY RASPBERRY, BLACKBERRY, BLACK CURRANT, ORANGE AND SOUR CHERRYSECTION 8 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 22, 2008CAEXCANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9—
Dec 26, 2007ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Mar 16, 2007CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Aug 28, 2002TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Nov 21, 1994C15AREGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK.—
Oct 19, 1994RRPRRESPONSE RECEIVED TO POST REG. ACTION—
Apr 20, 1994PR23POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 8 & 15—
Nov 17, 1993815FREGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) & SEC. 15 FILED—
Nov 17, 1987R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Aug 25, 1987PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jul 24, 1987NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jun 17, 1987CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Apr 16, 1987CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 20, 1987CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 11, 1987DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 29, 1987PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Dec 15, 1986PETRPETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED—
Oct 1, 1986ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Feb 20, 1986CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 12, 1986DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 12, 1985CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 17, 1985CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 6, 1985DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance