USPTO serial 73534128
NOK
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jun 23, 1998
- Examiner
- FRONT, MITCHELL
- Law office
- GENERIC WEB UPDATE
What this means
Status 800 means the registration was renewed after acceptable combined Section 8 and Section 9 filings. The mark remains registered for another 10-year term with active federal protection. Calendar the next Section 8 and 9 deadline in 10 years and maintain monitoring.
Need help with NOK?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
MINATO-KU, TOKYO, JP
MINATO-KU, TOKYO, JP
MINATO-KU, TOKYO, JP
NIPPON OIL SEAL INDUSTRY CO., LTD.
MINATO-KU, TOKYO, JP
Other trademarks owned by NIPPON OIL SEAL INDUSTRY CO., LTD.
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Mainak H. Mehta
Mainak H. Mehta Procopio, Cory, Hargreaves & Savitch LLP525 B. Street, Suite 2200,San Diego, CA 92101UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | POLYURETHANE RUBBER, FLUORORESIN, PHENOLIC MOLDING MATERIALS, POLYMERIZATION CATALYST FOR RUBBER AND POLYACRYLATE ELASTOMERS, ALL FOR USE IN INDUSTRY SOLD AS A RAW MATERIAL FOR THE MANUFACTURE OF SYNTHETIC RESIN PRODUCTS | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by NOK CORPORATION
- Other trademarks owned by NOK CORPORATION
- Other trademarks owned by NOK CORPORATION
- Other trademarks owned by NIPPON OIL SEAL INDUSTRY CO., LTD.
- Other trademarks in Class 001
- Similar marks named NOK
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 26, 2018 | NA89 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 9 - E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 26, 2018 | RNL2 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (SECOND RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Apr 26, 2018 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| Apr 26, 2018 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Apr 17, 2018 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 23, 2017 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| May 21, 2008 | RNL1 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| May 21, 2008 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| May 20, 2008 | PLGL | ASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL | — |
| May 8, 2008 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 14, 2007 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jul 12, 2004 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| May 21, 2004 | 815F | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) & SEC. 15 FILED | — |
| Jun 23, 1998 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Mar 31, 1998 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Feb 27, 1998 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jan 26, 1998 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 16, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 10, 1997 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 4, 1997 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 6, 1997 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 12, 1996 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 13, 1996 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 26, 1996 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 26, 1995 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 31, 1995 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 13, 1994 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 3, 1994 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 1, 1994 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 12, 1994 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 13, 1993 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 7, 1993 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 4, 1993 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 13, 1992 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 4, 1991 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 17, 1991 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 22, 1991 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 18, 1990 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 3, 1990 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 4, 1990 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 30, 1989 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 13, 1989 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 29, 1989 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 5, 1989 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 20, 1989 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 2, 1988 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 12, 1988 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 22, 1988 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 28, 1987 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 27, 1987 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 17, 1987 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 23, 1987 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 20, 1986 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 6, 1986 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 2, 1986 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 2, 1986 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 15, 1985 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 23, 1985 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 28, 1985 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 5, 1985 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |