USPTO serial 73534142
NOK
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Nov 30, 1993
- Examiner
- FINE, STEVEN
- Law office
- GENERIC WEB UPDATE
What this means
Status 800 means the registration was renewed after acceptable combined Section 8 and Section 9 filings. The mark remains registered for another 10-year term with active federal protection. Calendar the next Section 8 and 9 deadline in 10 years and maintain monitoring.
Need help with NOK?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
MINATO-KU, TOKYO, JP
MINATO-KU, TOKYO, JP
MINATO-KU, TOKYO, JP
MINATO-KU, TOKYO, JP
NIPPON OIL SEAL INDUSTRY CO., LTD.
MINATO-KU, TOKYO, JP
Other trademarks owned by NIPPON OIL SEAL INDUSTRY CO., LTD.
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Mainak H. Mehta
Mainak H. Mehta Procopio Cory Hargreaves & Savitch LLP525 B St. Suite 2200San Diego, CA 92101UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | RECOIL STARTERS FOR INTERNAL COMBUSTION ENGINES AND FOR OUTBOARD MOTORS AND FOR FARM-USE GENERATORS; MACHINE AND AIRCRAFT PARTS; NAMELY, VALVES, COUPLINGS, BELLOWS, DAMPERS, ROTARY JOINTS AND SWIVEL JOINTS; [MACHINE ENGINE FILTERS; OIL-LESS COMPRESSORS AND OIL-LESS VACUUM PUMPS; ]HYDRAULIC ACCUMULATORS; HYDRAULIC PUMPS AND PRESSURE UNITS; AND [CONCRETE BREAKING MACHINES] | ACTIVE | — |
| 011 | [VALVES FOR USE IN NUCLEAR POWER PLANTS] | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by NOK CORPORATION
- Other trademarks owned by NOK CORPORATION
- Other trademarks owned by NOK CORPORATION
- Other trademarks owned by NOK CORPORATION
- Other trademarks owned by NIPPON OIL SEAL INDUSTRY CO., LTD.
- Other trademarks in Class 007
- Other trademarks in Class 011
- Similar marks named NOK
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 27, 2024 | NA89 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 9 - E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 27, 2024 | RNL3 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (THIRD RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Mar 27, 2024 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| Mar 27, 2024 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Nov 2, 2023 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 3, 2013 | NAS8 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 - MAILED | — |
| Oct 3, 2013 | RNL2 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (SECOND RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Oct 3, 2013 | 9G8P | REGISTERED - SEC. 9 GRANTED/CHECK RECORD FOR SEC. 8 | — |
| Oct 3, 2013 | 8PRT | REGISTERED - PARTIAL SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED | — |
| Oct 2, 2013 | 89AF | REGISTERED - COMBINED SECTION 8 (10-YR) & SEC. 9 FILED | — |
| Oct 2, 2013 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 12, 2007 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Aug 20, 2003 | RNL1 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Aug 20, 2003 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| Jul 15, 2003 | 89AF | REGISTERED - COMBINED SECTION 8 (10-YR) & SEC. 9 FILED | — |
| Jul 15, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 15, 1999 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Feb 5, 1999 | 815F | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) & SEC. 15 FILED | — |
| Nov 30, 1993 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Sep 7, 1993 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 6, 1993 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| May 17, 1993 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 13, 1993 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Apr 20, 1993 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 30, 1993 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 24, 1993 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 1, 1992 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 24, 1992 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 23, 1992 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 1, 1991 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 31, 1991 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 3, 1990 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 4, 1990 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 30, 1989 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 19, 1989 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 23, 1989 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 23, 1988 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 12, 1988 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 22, 1988 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 14, 1987 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 17, 1987 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 24, 1987 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 27, 1986 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 13, 1986 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 2, 1986 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 14, 1986 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 14, 1986 | ZZZZ | ALLOWANCE/COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Apr 2, 1986 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 22, 1986 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 16, 1985 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 23, 1985 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 1, 1985 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 12, 1985 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |