USPTO serial 73534147
NOK
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 614
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- WHITAKER, LAURIE
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with NOK?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
MINATO-KU, TOKYO, JP
NIPPON OIL SEAL INDUSTRY CO., LTD.
MINATO-KU, TOKYO, JP
Other trademarks owned by NIPPON OIL SEAL INDUSTRY CO., LTD.
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
JOHN K. DONAGHY
JOHN K DONAGHY SUGHRUE, MION, ZINN, MACPEAK & SEAS1776 K ST N WWASHINGTON, DC 20006UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 017 | SEALS AND SEALANTS FOR JOINTS | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 6, 1993 | PETD | PETITION TO REVIVE-DENIED | — |
| Apr 19, 1993 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 10, 1992 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 10, 1992 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 7, 1992 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 8, 1991 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 9, 1990 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 19, 1990 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 3, 1990 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 28, 1989 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 29, 1989 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 5, 1989 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 20, 1989 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 2, 1988 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 12, 1988 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 22, 1988 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 27, 1987 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 17, 1987 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 23, 1987 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 22, 1986 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 5, 1986 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 3, 1986 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 26, 1986 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 16, 1985 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 23, 1985 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 25, 1985 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 5, 1985 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |