USPTO serial 73535652
BANJO'S
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Sep 19, 1989
- Examiner
- SPARROW, MARY
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with BANJO'S?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
MELBOURNE, VICTORIA, AU
MELBOURNE, VICTORIA, AU
MELBOURNE, VICTORIA, AU
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
CRYSTAL T. WHITESCARVER
CRYSTAL T WHITESCARVER CARLTON FIELDSP O BOX 3239TAMPA, FL 33601UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 030 | BREAD | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 25, 1996 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Sep 19, 1989 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jun 27, 1989 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 29, 1989 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| May 27, 1989 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 22, 1989 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 17, 1989 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Dec 28, 1988 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 27, 1988 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| May 10, 1988 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 20, 1988 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 1, 1987 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 31, 1987 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 6, 1987 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 2, 1987 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 1, 1986 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 5, 1986 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 15, 1986 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 14, 1986 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 9, 1986 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 7, 1986 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 28, 1986 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 24, 1986 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 20, 1985 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 21, 1985 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 17, 1985 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |