USPTO serial 73538099
TRIAD
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BRUCE, MARY FRANCES
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with TRIAD?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
TROUTDALE, OR
ASPEN RECREATIONAL PRODUCTS, LTD.
CARBONDALE, CO
TROUTDALE, OR
CARBONDALE, CO
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
ERNEST A. WEGNER
ERNEST A WEGNER WOOD, DALTON, PHILLIPS, MASON & ROWE20 N WACKER DRCHICAGO, IL 60606UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | AUDIO REPRODUCTION APPARATUS, NAMELY, LOUDSPEAKERS | ABANDONED | Jan 6, 1982 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by TRIAD DESIGN, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by ASPEN RECREATIONAL PRODUCTS, LTD.
- Other trademarks owned by TRIAD DESIGN, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by ASPEN RECREATIONAL, LTD.
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Similar marks named TRIAD
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 29, 1992 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jul 24, 1992 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Jul 24, 1992 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jan 3, 1992 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Mar 26, 1991 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Feb 22, 1991 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jan 4, 1991 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 26, 1989 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 13, 1989 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 17, 1988 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 27, 1988 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 30, 1986 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 26, 1986 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 10, 1986 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 8, 1985 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |