USPTO serial 73538235
ENDURANCE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- STINE, DAVID
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with ENDURANCE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
JAMES L. DOOLEY
JAMES L DOOLEY CUSHMAN, DARBY & CUSHMAN1801 K ST N WWASHINGTON, DC 20006UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | REMANUFACTURED AND NEW AUTO PARTS, NAMELY ALTERNATORS, DISTRIBUTORS, ELECTRIC MOTORS, AIR CONDITIONER COMPRESSORS, GENERATORS AND CARBURETORS | ABANDONED | — |
| 012 | REMANUFACTURED AND NEW AUTO PARTS, NAMELY STARTERS, WATER PUMPS, FUEL PUMPS, SMOG PUMPS, MASTER CYLINDERS, BRAKE KITS COMPRISING BRAKE REPLACEMENT PARTS SOLD AS A UNIT, AND CLUTCH KITS COMPRISING CLUTCH REPLACEMENT PARTS SOLD AS A UNIT | ABANDONED | May 30, 1984 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 21, 1988 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Feb 8, 1988 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Sep 1, 1987 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Mar 9, 1987 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Jan 20, 1987 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jan 16, 1987 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Nov 17, 1986 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 14, 1986 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 14, 1986 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 19, 1986 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 14, 1985 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 3, 1985 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |