USPTO serial 73538647
THE CALIFORNIA COLLECTION OF FINE WINE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Sep 16, 1986
- Examiner
- โ
- Law office
- SCANNING ON DEMAND
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with THE CALIFORNIA COLLECTION OF FINE WINE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
TINA SALEM
RICHARD J POLLEY ESQ KLARQUIST SPARKMAN LLPONE WORLD TRADE CTR STE 1600121 SW SALMON STPORTLAND, OR 97204Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 033 | WINES | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Apr 11, 1984 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited ยง2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 23, 2007 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | โ |
| Nov 15, 2006 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | โ |
| Oct 2, 2006 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | โ |
| Jan 5, 2006 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | โ |
| Mar 17, 1993 | 8.OK | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED | The USPTO accepted your Section 8 declaration showing the mark is still in use in commerce (or excusable nonuse). This satisfies the six-year maintenance requirement and keeps the registration active until the next renewal deadline. |
| Feb 10, 1993 | RRPR | RESPONSE RECEIVED TO POST REG. ACTION | โ |
| Dec 22, 1992 | PR23 | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 8 & 15 | โ |
| Nov 23, 1992 | RRPR | RESPONSE RECEIVED TO POST REG. ACTION | โ |
| Jun 19, 1992 | PR23 | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 8 & 15 | โ |
| Mar 25, 1992 | 815F | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) & SEC. 15 FILED | โ |
| Sep 16, 1986 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| Jun 30, 1986 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | โ |
| May 5, 1986 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | โ |
| Feb 5, 1986 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 27, 1985 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | โ |
| Nov 4, 1985 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 12, 1985 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | โ |
| Jul 18, 1985 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |