USPTO serial 73538774
HTC
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- HAMILTON, MICHAEL
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with HTC?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
ERNEST I. GIFFORD
GIFFORD, VAN OPHEM, SHERIDAN, SPRINKLE A ND NABOZNY, PC280 N WOODWARDSTE 210BIRMINGHAM, MI 48011Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | ACCESSORIES FOR WOODWORKING MACHINES-NAMELY, ROLLER TABLES, PEDESTAL ROLLERS, OUTFEED ROLLERS, AND MOBILE MACHINE BASES | ABANDONED | Nov 1, 1982 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 21, 1987 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Mar 26, 1987 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Mar 26, 1987 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Jun 23, 1986 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 23, 1986 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| May 15, 1986 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Apr 21, 1986 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Oct 17, 1985 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 13, 1985 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 2, 1985 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 5, 1985 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |