USPTO serial 73538816
REBOUND
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- FISHER, HANNAH
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with REBOUND?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
HAROLD R. WOODARD
HAROLD R WOODARD WOODARD, EMHARDT, NAUGHTON, ET ALSTE 2600ONE INDIANA SQINDIANAPOLIS, IN 46204Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | MEDICAL TREATMENT OF SPORTS-RELATED INJURIES BY HOSPITAL-BASED REGISTERED PHYSICAL THERAPISTS AND CERTIFIED ATHLETIC TRAINERS IN A HOSPITAL-AFFILIATED SPORTS MEDICINE UNIT | ABANDONED | Apr 1, 1985 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 27, 1996 | CU.T | CONCURRENT USE TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Nov 25, 1996 | CU.D | CONCURRENT USE DENIED NO. 999999 | — |
| Oct 20, 1996 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Nov 16, 1995 | CU.I | CONCURRENT USE PROC. INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| May 27, 1986 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 27, 1986 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 20, 1986 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 14, 1986 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jan 24, 1986 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 7, 1985 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 24, 1985 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 23, 1985 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |