USPTO serial 73539114
LADY ROSE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 1544095Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jun 20, 1989
- Examiner
- REIHNER, DAVID
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with LADY ROSE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
JOSEPH E. MUETH
JOSEPH E MUETH700 S FLOWER STSTE 2200LOS ANGELES, CA 90017Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | COSMETIC AND MAKE-UP ITEMS, NAMELY LIPSTICK, LIP-LINERS, BLUSHER, CREME ROUGE, POWDER ROUGE, FLUID MAKE-UP WITH APPLICATOR BRUSHES; NAIL CARE PRODUCTS NAMELY RIDGE FILLER, NAIL POLISH, NAIL POLISH REMOVER, NAIL OIL, CUTICLE REMOVING PREPARATIONS, EMERY BOARDS; EYE COSMETICS NAMELY MASCARA, EYELINERS, EYEBROW PENCILS, EYE SHADOW, EYE MAKE-UP REMOVERS, ARTIFICIAL LASHES; SKIN CARE PRODUCTS NAMELY BODY POWDER, DAY CREAM, NIGHT CREAM, SKIN TONIC, CLEANSING MILK, PERFUME FOR MEN AND WOMEN, AFTER SHAVE, DEODORANT SPRAY, DEODORANT STICK, SOAP AND BUBBLE BATH | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 26, 1995 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| May 25, 1994 | CAND | CANCELLATION DENIED NO. 999999 | — |
| Mar 10, 1992 | PETC | CANCELLATION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jun 20, 1989 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Mar 14, 1989 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Feb 10, 1989 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Nov 23, 1988 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 31, 1988 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 4, 1988 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 22, 1988 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 6, 1987 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 6, 1987 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 3, 1987 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 23, 1987 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 17, 1987 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 23, 1986 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 24, 1986 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 9, 1986 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 17, 1985 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 14, 1985 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 17, 1985 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 13, 1985 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 9, 1985 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 29, 1985 | CANT | CANCELLATION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |