USPTO serial 73541031
OKIE-DOKIE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 1402245Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jul 22, 1986
- Examiner
- —
- Law office
- SCANNING ON DEMAND
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with OKIE-DOKIE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
DALLAS, TX
LOS ANGELES, CA
LOS ANGELES, CA
J. C. PENNEY PRIVATE BRANDS, INC.
PLANO, TX
LOS ANGELES, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
ALAN S. LANGER
ALAN S LANGER LEGAL DEPT A1 MS: 1115J C PENNEY CORPORATION INC6501 LEGACY DRPLANO, TX 75024-3698Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 025 | CLOTHING - [ SWEATERS (WOMEN, JUNIOR, AND MISS), TEE SHIRTS, ] SKIRTS, PANTS, [ BLOUSES, ] COATS [ AND JACKETS ] | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Jan 22, 1985 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by J.C. PENNEY COMPANY, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by T.B.L. KNITTING MILL CORP.
- Other trademarks owned by T.B.L. KNITTING MILL CORP.
- Other trademarks owned by J. C. PENNEY PRIVATE BRANDS, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by T.B.L. KNITTING MILL CORP.
- Other trademarks in Class 025
- Similar marks named OKIE-DOKIE
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 16, 2020 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Mar 27, 2020 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Jul 13, 2016 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Jul 22, 2015 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 21, 2013 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Jun 5, 2013 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Oct 5, 2006 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| May 30, 2006 | RNL1 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| May 30, 2006 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| May 16, 2006 | PLGL | ASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL | — |
| Feb 28, 2006 | 89AF | REGISTERED - COMBINED SECTION 8 (10-YR) & SEC. 9 FILED | — |
| Feb 28, 2006 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 20, 2006 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 11, 2005 | PLGL | ASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL | — |
| Oct 22, 1992 | 8.OK | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED | The USPTO accepted your Section 8 declaration showing the mark is still in use in commerce (or excusable nonuse). This satisfies the six-year maintenance requirement and keeps the registration active until the next renewal deadline. |
| Jul 21, 1992 | 8.AF | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) FILED | — |
| Jul 21, 1992 | XXXX | POST REGISTRATION ACTION CORRECTION | — |
| Feb 16, 1990 | A7OK | AMENDMENT UNDER SECTION 7 - PROCESSED | — |
| Dec 11, 1989 | RRPR | RESPONSE RECEIVED TO POST REG. ACTION | — |
| Nov 3, 1989 | PRAM | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 7 | — |
| Mar 17, 1989 | PRAM | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 7 | — |
| Jan 26, 1989 | AMD7 | SEC 7 REQUEST FILED | — |
| Jul 22, 1986 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Apr 29, 1986 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 29, 1986 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 30, 1986 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Feb 28, 1986 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 28, 1986 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 30, 1985 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 6, 1985 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 23, 1985 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 18, 1985 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |