Drawing for TOXI-CHROMOTEST

USPTO serial 73541820

TOXI-CHROMOTEST

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
—
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 602: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with TOXI-CHROMOTEST?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

NEIL F. GREENBLUM

NEIL F GREENBLUM SANDLER & GREENBLUM2920 S GLEBE RDARLINGTON, VA 22206UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
010VITRO DITS FOR THE DECTION OF TOXINS IN A SUGBSTANCE, CONSISTING PRIMARILY OF MEDIUM FOR BACTERIAL GROWTH, DRIED BACTERIA, DMSO, STANDARD GENITOXIC SUBSTANCES, CHROMOGENIC SUBSTRATERS, DILUENTS OF CHROMOGENIC SUBSTRATES, STOPPING SOLUTION AND DISPOSABLE LOOPS, PLATES, PIPETTES AND BAGSABANDONED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (ABN2): The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Apr 1, 1992ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Aug 9, 1991CNSIINQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED—
Dec 14, 1990CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Nov 2, 1990CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 2, 1990CNSIINQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED—
Oct 25, 1989CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Aug 10, 1989REINREINSTATED—
Jul 3, 1989ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jan 18, 1989NAUDNOTICE OF UNRESPONSIVE AMENDMENT - MAILED—
Nov 18, 1988UNPRUNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED—
Nov 16, 1988CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 27, 1988DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 13, 1988CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Mar 15, 1988CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 16, 1987CNSIINQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED—
Mar 13, 1987CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Mar 2, 1987CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 3, 1986CNSIINQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED—
Apr 4, 1986CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Apr 3, 1986DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 3, 1986DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 25, 1986CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 11, 1985CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 23, 1985DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jul 31, 1985AMPXPRELIMINARY/VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT - ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance