USPTO serial 73543859
FREQUENT BUYER
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- DEMOS, JOHN C., JR.
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with FREQUENT BUYER?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
JAMES G. STAPLES
JAMES G STAPLES BAKER & MCKENZIEONE PRUDENTIAL PLZ130 E RANDOLPH DRCHICAGO, IL 60601Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 036 | PROVIDING CASH REFUNDS FOR PURCHASERS OFSTEEL FOR INDUSTRIAL USE | ABANDONED | May 15, 1985 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 15, 1990 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 23, 1989 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Sep 22, 1989 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Jul 19, 1989 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Mar 15, 1988 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 18, 1988 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jan 6, 1988 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Jun 4, 1987 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 19, 1987 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 19, 1987 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Sep 29, 1986 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 27, 1986 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 3, 1985 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 16, 1985 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |