USPTO serial 73544506
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This registration is in, or will soon enter, a USPTO maintenance window. Missing a Section 8 or Section 9 filing can cancel the registration.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Plus Government fees of $650
CINCINNATI, OH, US
ARCONIC FASTENING SYSTEMS & RINGS - AUSTRALIA PTY LTD
CLAYTON VICTORIA, AU
Other trademarks owned by ARCONIC FASTENING SYSTEMS & RINGS - AUSTRALIA PTY LTD
CINCINNATI, OH, US
ALCOA FASTENING SYSTEMS-AUSTRALIA PTY LTD.
OAKLEIGH, VICTORIA, AU
Other trademarks owned by ALCOA FASTENING SYSTEMS-AUSTRALIA PTY LTD.
BRIMECH INDUSTRIES AUSTRALIA PTY., LTD.
OAKLEIGH, VICTORIA, AU
Other trademarks owned by BRIMECH INDUSTRIES AUSTRALIA PTY., LTD.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Erik N. Lund
Erik N. Lund Whitestone Law PLLC8000 Westpark Drive. Suite 250Mclean, VA 22102United States| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 006 | METAL THREAD INSERTS, AND INSTALLATION KITS FOR INSTALLING METAL THREAD INSERTS (EACH KIT CONTAINING METAL THREAD INSERTS, A TAP, AND AN INSTALLATION/TANG BREAKOFF TOOL, AND INSTRUCTIONS) | ACTIVE | Sep 10, 1984 |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 31, 2026 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 18, 2025 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 3, 2021 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Apr 16, 2019 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 16, 2019 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 26, 2017 | NA89 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 9 - E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 26, 2017 | RNL2 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (SECOND RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Jan 26, 2017 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| Jan 26, 2017 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Nov 23, 2016 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Nov 17, 2016 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 18, 2015 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 30, 2007 | RNL1 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Jan 30, 2007 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| Jan 17, 2007 | PLGL | ASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL | — |
| Nov 9, 2006 | 89AF | REGISTERED - COMBINED SECTION 8 (10-YR) & SEC. 9 FILED | — |
| Nov 9, 2006 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 24, 2006 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 24, 2006 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 28, 2006 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Feb 25, 1993 | 8.OK | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED | The USPTO accepted your Section 8 declaration showing the mark is still in use in commerce (or excusable nonuse). This satisfies the six-year maintenance requirement and keeps the registration active until the next renewal deadline. |
| Nov 18, 1992 | 8.AF | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) FILED | — |
| Aug 10, 1989 | C.7C | NEW CERTIFICATE UNDER SECTION 7 - PROCESSED | — |
| Jul 13, 1989 | RRPR | RESPONSE RECEIVED TO POST REG. ACTION | — |
| Jun 29, 1989 | PRAM | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 7 | — |
| Jun 20, 1989 | RRPR | RESPONSE RECEIVED TO POST REG. ACTION | — |
| Mar 15, 1989 | PRAM | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 7 | — |
| Dec 13, 1988 | CANT | CANCELLATION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Nov 30, 1988 | CAND | CANCELLATION DENIED NO. 999999 | — |
| Oct 31, 1988 | C.7F | REQUEST FOR NEW CERTIFICATE FILED | — |
| Oct 31, 1988 | C.7F | REQUEST FOR NEW CERTIFICATE FILED | — |
| Feb 8, 1988 | PETC | CANCELLATION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Nov 18, 1986 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| Sep 23, 1986 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 5, 1986 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 26, 1986 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 6, 1986 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 13, 1985 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 29, 1985 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |