USPTO serial 73545011
TALKING TRIVIA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- RUPP, TERRY
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with TALKING TRIVIA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
TORONTO, ONTARIO, CA
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 028 | EQUIPMENT INCLUDING RECORDS OR TAPES SOLD AS A UNIT FOR PLAYING A QUIZ GAME | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 2, 1996 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 3, 1995 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 21, 1994 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 13, 1994 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 13, 1994 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 10, 1993 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 24, 1993 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 17, 1992 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 4, 1992 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 5, 1991 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 23, 1990 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 1, 1990 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 24, 1989 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 3, 1989 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 3, 1989 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 25, 1988 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 8, 1988 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 14, 1987 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 1, 1986 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 10, 1986 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 9, 1986 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 2, 1985 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 27, 1985 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Oct 31, 1985 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 12, 1985 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 1, 1985 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |