Drawing for CAJUN COUNTRY

USPTO serial 73545728

CAJUN COUNTRY

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
FISHER, HANNAH
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with CAJUN COUNTRY?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

GREGORY C. SMITH

GREGORY C SMITH PRAVEL, GAMBRELL, HEWITT & KIMBALLTENTH FL1177 W LOOP SHOUSTON, TX 77027

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
042FAST FOOD CARRY OUT AND RESTAURANT SERVICES, SERVING PARTICULARLY CHICKEN AND ANDOUILLE GUMBO, SEAFOOD GUMBO, RED BEANS AND RICE WITH SAUSAGE, JAMBALAYA WITH COLE SLAW, SHRIMP CREOLE, SPICY CRAYFISH ETOUFEE, OYSTER ARTICHOKE SOUP, CRAYFISH AND CRABMEAT FETTUCINI, TURTLE SOUP, ALLIGATOR SAUCE PIQUANTE, AND CATFISHABANDONEDMay 1, 1985

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 23, 1988EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Jan 28, 1988ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Jan 28, 1988EXFBEXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF—
Nov 25, 1986EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Apr 22, 1986CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Feb 3, 1986CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 29, 1985CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 28, 1985DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance