USPTO serial 73546567
ELECTRAFOR
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- HINES PATRICK
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with ELECTRAFOR?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
SHANDON SOUTHERN PRODUCTS LIMITED
ASTMOOR, RUNCORN, CHESHIRE, GB
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
MELVILLE OWEN
MELVILLE OWEN OWEN, WICKERSHAM & ERICKSON433 CALIFORNIA STSAN FRANCISCO, CA 94104UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | CHEMICAL PREPARATIONS FOR USE IN STAINING BATHS, NAMELY, CELLULOSE ACETATE MEDIA | ABANDONED | — |
| 009 | LABORATORY EQUIPMENT, NAMELY POWER SUPPLIES, CHAMBERS AND ANCILLARIES USED IN CONJUNCTION WITH ELECTROPHORESIS, SHAKERS, EVAPORATORS, AND HEATERS USED IN THE PREPARATION OF ELECTROPHORETIC MEDIA, DENSITOMETERS, STAINERS, PROCESSORS AND STAINING BATHS USED IN THE VISUALIZATION OF ELECTROPHORETIC MEDIA, AND MEMBRANES FOR EFFECTING ELECTROPHORETIC SEPARATIONS | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 1, 1989 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 1, 1989 | ZZZZ | ALLOWANCE/COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Apr 18, 1989 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 17, 1989 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 26, 1988 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 2, 1988 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 17, 1988 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 5, 1987 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 5, 1987 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 24, 1987 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 2, 1987 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 29, 1986 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 26, 1986 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 25, 1986 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 11, 1986 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 16, 1986 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 13, 1986 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Mar 28, 1986 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 7, 1985 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 13, 1985 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |