USPTO serial 73547503
CREOLE'S STUFFED BREAD
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- O LEAR, JANICE
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with CREOLE'S STUFFED BREAD?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
GREGORY C. SMITH
GREGORY C SMITH PRAVEL, GAMBRELL, HEWITT & KIMBALL1177 W LOOP STENTH FLHOUSTON, TX 77027-9095Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 030 | BREAD DOUGH STUFFED WITH MEAT, SAUSAGE, CHEESE, AND PEPPERS | ABANDONED | Aug 8, 1984 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 24, 1988 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 26, 1988 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Oct 28, 1987 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Oct 28, 1987 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Jul 17, 1987 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Jul 17, 1987 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 15, 1987 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Dec 31, 1986 | ZZZZ | ALLOWANCE/COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Jun 6, 1986 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 28, 1986 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 31, 1986 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 24, 1985 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 20, 1985 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |