USPTO serial 73547576
GIGI
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- FOSTER, STEVEN
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with GIGI?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
STUART R. PETERSON
STUART R PETERSON PETERSON, WICKS, NEMER & KAMRATH, PA1407 SOO LINE BLDGMINNEAPOLIS, MN 55402UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | RETAIL STORE SERVICES IN THE FIELD OF WOMEN'S WEAR | ABANDONED | Aug 31, 1981 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 26, 1988 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Dec 22, 1987 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Oct 22, 1987 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Jun 4, 1987 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Dec 11, 1986 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Nov 17, 1986 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Nov 14, 1986 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Nov 10, 1986 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Nov 10, 1986 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Aug 29, 1986 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 30, 1986 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Jun 2, 1986 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 20, 1986 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 28, 1986 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 11, 1985 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 25, 1985 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |