USPTO serial 73547603
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
MINNEAPOLIS, MN
BRENTWOOD, TN
MINNEAPOLIS, MN
MINNEAPOLIS, MN
BRENTWOOD, TN
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
JANIS M. MANNING
JANIS M MANNING BURNS, DOANE, SWECKER & MATHISP O BOX 1404ALEXANDRIA, VA 22313-1404UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | MEDICAL CLINICS FOR REHABILITATION OF ATHLETIC INJURIES | ABANDONED | Jan 14, 1985 |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 24, 1997 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Nov 27, 1996 | CU.T | CONCURRENT USE TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Nov 25, 1996 | CU.D | CONCURRENT USE DENIED NO. 999999 | — |
| Nov 16, 1995 | CU.I | CONCURRENT USE PROC. INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Feb 14, 1994 | CRTP | REG. CANCELLED - RESTORED TO PENDENCY | — |
| Jun 29, 1993 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Apr 12, 1993 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Mar 22, 1993 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| May 6, 1988 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Nov 3, 1987 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 2, 1987 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Aug 20, 1987 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 7, 1986 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 15, 1985 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 2, 1985 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 25, 1985 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |