Drawing for LOTUS FLOWER

USPTO serial 73547967

LOTUS FLOWER

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
FINE, STEVEN
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with LOTUS FLOWER?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

MARTIN SMOLOWITZ

STE 1500TWO PENNSYLVANIA PLZNEW YORK, NY 10121

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
008STAINLESS STEEL WARE AND STAINLESS STEEL CUTLERYABANDONED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 24, 1987ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Nov 24, 1987EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Sep 2, 1987EXFBEXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF—
Mar 24, 1987CNCFCONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED—
Feb 24, 1987CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 14, 1987CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Dec 9, 1986JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Apr 24, 1986CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Mar 24, 1986CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 28, 1985CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 11, 1985DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance