USPTO serial 73548280
N CLAD N
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- HINES PATRICK
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with N CLAD N?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
KINGSGROVE, NEW SOUTH WALES, AU
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
ROBERT B. MURRAY
ROBERT B MURRAY ARMSTRONG, NIKAIDO, MARMELSTEIN ET ALSTE 10001725 K ST N WWASHINGTON, DC 20006Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | METAL SHEATHED ELECTRICAL CABLES CONTAINING ONE OR MORE CONDUCTOR WIRES, THERMOCOUPLES, SIGNAL CABLES AND TRANSDUCERS FOR NEUTRON DETECTORS | ABANDONED | — |
| 011 | HEATING ELEMENTS FOR USE IN SPACE HEATERS, FLOOR HEATERS, FURNACES, OVENS, HEAT SENSING DEVICING AND HEAT TRACING CABLE | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 30, 1990 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 20, 1989 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 17, 1989 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 17, 1989 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 17, 1988 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 18, 1988 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 23, 1988 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 23, 1987 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 12, 1987 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 30, 1987 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 9, 1987 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 8, 1986 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 14, 1986 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 27, 1986 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 27, 1986 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 9, 1985 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |