USPTO serial 73548924
SIMEX
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jul 28, 1987
- Examiner
- REIHNER, DAVID
- Law office
- POST REGISTRATION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with SIMEX?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
SAN FRANCISCO, CA
SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CA
SAN FRANCISCO, CA
PACIFICA, CA
SAN FRANCISCO, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
CRAIG H. KRONMAN
CRAIG H KRONMAN703 MARKET STSTE 612SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94103Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | COCONUT BALLS, PROCESSED SWEET BEANS, YAM JAM, COCO JELLY, PINEAPPLE JELLY, COCO GELATIN (UNSWEETENED AND UNFLAVORED), PINEAPPLE GELATIN (UNSWEETENED AND UNFLAVORED), PROCESSED RED MUNG BEANS, MANGO HALVES, SALTED SHELLED OYSTERS, CRAB PASTE, PEANUT STEW, SALTED TINY SHRIMP, SAUTEED TINY SHRIMP, FRESH ANCHOVIES, SMOKED SARDINES, DRIED SARDINES, FRESH SARDINES, RIPE JACKFRUIT IN SUGAR AND WATER, AND CHICK PEAS | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | May 5, 1971 |
| 030 | PALM SUGAR, COCO GELATIN (SWEETENED AND FLAVORED), PINEAPPLE GELATIN (SWEETENED AND FLAVORED), PRESERVED ANCHOVY SAUCE, EGGROLL WRAPPERS, RICE STICK NOODLES, FISH SAUCE, AND RICE CAKES | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | May 5, 1971 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by MEL A. SANTANDER CORPORATION
- Other trademarks owned by MANILA P.I.
- Other trademarks owned by MEL A. SANTANDER CORPORATION
- Other trademarks owned by BRODETH INC.
- Other trademarks owned by MEL A. SANTANDER CORPORATION
- Other trademarks in Class 029
- Other trademarks in Class 030
- Similar marks named SIMEX
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 27, 2020 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Oct 29, 2014 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Oct 23, 2014 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Jun 4, 2007 | RNL1 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Jun 4, 2007 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| May 24, 2007 | PLGL | ASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL | — |
| Apr 30, 2007 | 89AF | REGISTERED - COMBINED SECTION 8 (10-YR) & SEC. 9 FILED | — |
| Apr 30, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 20, 2007 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| May 12, 1993 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Mar 19, 1993 | RRPR | RESPONSE RECEIVED TO POST REG. ACTION | — |
| Mar 2, 1993 | PR23 | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 8 & 15 | — |
| Nov 13, 1992 | 815F | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) & SEC. 15 FILED | — |
| Jul 28, 1987 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| May 5, 1987 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 3, 1987 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 10, 1987 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 2, 1987 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 14, 1986 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 14, 1986 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 22, 1986 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 18, 1986 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 18, 1986 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 18, 1986 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 28, 1985 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 21, 1985 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |