USPTO serial 73548953
EVEN FLOW
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 1411843Status 713
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Sep 30, 1986
- Examiner
- MANDIR, FREDERICK
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with EVEN FLOW?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
THOMAS M. SCHMITZ
THE GLIDDEN COMPANY925 EUCLID AVESTE 900CLEVELAND, OH 44115Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 002 | SURFACE PAINT FOR BUILDING STRUCTURES | SECTION 18 - CANCELLED | Jun 21, 1985 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 21, 2002 | C18. | CANCELLED SECTION 18-TOTAL | — |
| Feb 21, 2002 | CANT | CANCELLATION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Dec 19, 2001 | CANG | CANCELLATION GRANTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jan 17, 2001 | PETC | CANCELLATION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Oct 22, 1992 | 8.OK | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED | The USPTO accepted your Section 8 declaration showing the mark is still in use in commerce (or excusable nonuse). This satisfies the six-year maintenance requirement and keeps the registration active until the next renewal deadline. |
| Jul 8, 1992 | 8.AF | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) FILED | — |
| Oct 27, 1986 | CMMP | MISCELLANEOUS PAPER | — |
| Sep 30, 1986 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| Aug 15, 1986 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 23, 1986 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 19, 1986 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 14, 1986 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 15, 1985 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 13, 1985 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |