Drawing for RICHARD ROYCE COLLECTION

USPTO serial 73549565

RICHARD ROYCE COLLECTION

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
—
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with RICHARD ROYCE COLLECTION?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

ROBERT S. LIPTON

ROBERT S. LIPTON LIPTON & FAMIGLIO201 NORTH JACKSON STREET P.O. BOX 546MEDIA, PA 19063UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
025LADIES' FOOTWEAR SOLD EXCLUSIVELY THROUGH NEW YORK CITY SHOES FRANCHISEABANDONEDMar 25, 1985

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 6, 1988EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Jun 25, 1988ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Jun 24, 1988EXPAEX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED—
Dec 29, 1987CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED—
Jun 16, 1987CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
May 21, 1987DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 12, 1987JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Mar 10, 1987EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Dec 1, 1986CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 18, 1986CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jul 25, 1986ZZZZALLOWANCE/COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Jun 20, 1986CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 20, 1986CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 4, 1986CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED—
Feb 18, 1986CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 16, 1985CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 22, 1985CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 25, 1985DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance