USPTO serial 73550684
HOME CONCEPTS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- —
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with HOME CONCEPTS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
SAN FRANCISCO, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
STERLING L. ROSS, JR.
STERLING L ROSS JR655 REDWOOD HWYSTE 360MILL VALLEY, CA 94941Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 008 | CUTLERY AND STAINLESS STEEL FLATWARE, NAMELY KNIVES, FORKS, AND SPOONS | ABANDONED | Aug 31, 1984 |
| 021 | LACQUERWARE TRAYS, COASTERS AND BOWLS; COFFEE SETS COMPRISED OF POTS, MUGS, AND TRAYS; ONION SOUP BOWLS; TEAPOTS SOLD WITH BAG COASTERS; CANNISTER SETS; COOKIE JARS; GRAVY BOATS SOLD WITH STANDS THEREFOR; COVERED BUTTER DISHES; SALT AND PEPER SHAKERS; CASSEROLE DISHES; MUGS; CONDIMENT SETS SOLD WITH WOODEN STANDS; KITCHEN TOOL SETS; KITCHEN TOOL SETS; KITCHEN COUNTER SETS; MUGS; GLASSES AND STEMWARE; AND MARBLE BATH ACCESSORIES | ABANDONED | Aug 31, 1984 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 27, 1987 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 30, 1986 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 25, 1986 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 15, 1986 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 18, 1985 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 25, 1985 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |