Drawing for SOS

USPTO serial 73550907

SOS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
WENDEL, HELEN R.
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 602: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with SOS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

GEORGE A. BODE

GEORGE A BODE BODE & ASSOCIATES2314 BROADWAYNEW ORLEANS, LA 70125UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
005ORTHOPEDIC APPLIANCES - NAMELY, CERVICAL COLLARS, CLAVICLE SUPPORTS, SHOULDER IMMOBILIZERS, ARM SLINGS, ARM ELEVATORS, ELBOW SUPPORTS, WRIST AND FOREARM SUPPORTS, ABDOMINAL BINDERS, RIB BELTS, LUMBOSACRAL SUPPORTS, PELVIC TRACTION BELTS, BUCKS TRACTION, CERVICAL TRACTION, KNEE IMMOBILIZERS, ANKLE SUPPORTS, POST-OPERATIVE SHOES, CAST SHOES, SPLINTS, PROTECTORS SLINGS, RESTRAINTS AND PADSABANDONEDNov 22, 1983

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (ABN2): The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 31, 1986ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jun 4, 1986CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
May 29, 1986DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 23, 1986CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 17, 1985CNEAEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED—
Oct 7, 1985DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance