Drawing for MURRAY'S

USPTO serial 73552884

MURRAY'S

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
TAYLOR, CRAIG
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with MURRAY'S?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

MALCOLM L. MOORE

MALCOLM L MOORE WILLIAMSON, BAINS, MOORE & HANSEN608 BLDGSTE 668MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55402

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
042RESTAURANT SERVICES FOR DINING ON THE PREMISESABANDONED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 21, 1987EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Aug 21, 1987EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Jun 1, 1987EXFBEXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF—
Jun 1, 1987EXFBEXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF—
Feb 13, 1987EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Feb 13, 1987EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Dec 31, 1986ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Jun 30, 1986CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
May 19, 1986CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 13, 1985CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 31, 1985DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance