USPTO serial 73553240
PCMAIL
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jan 23, 1990
- Examiner
- —
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with PCMAIL?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
SILVER SPRING, MD
SILVER SPRING, MD
SILVER SPRING, MD
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
JOHN R. GARBER
JOHN R GARBER ITT DIALCOM, INC320 PARK AVENEW YORK, NY 10022UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 038 | ELECTRONIC MAIL SERVICES | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 29, 1996 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Jan 23, 1990 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| Oct 29, 1989 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 20, 1989 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 10, 1989 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 10, 1989 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 25, 1989 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 17, 1987 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 27, 1987 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 27, 1987 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 27, 1987 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 5, 1987 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 24, 1987 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 17, 1987 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 2, 1987 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 23, 1986 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 21, 1986 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 1, 1986 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 7, 1985 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 1, 1985 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 29, 1985 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |