USPTO serial 73553299
HEALTHY LIFE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- ZAK, HENRY
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with HEALTHY LIFE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
KINGSGROVE, NEW SOUTH WALES, AU
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
CHRISTOPHER A. MEYER
CHRISTOPHER A MEYER PROSKAUER ROSE GOETZ & MENDELSOHN2001 L ST N WWASHINGTON, DC 20036UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | PRESERVED, DRIED AND COOKED FRUITS AND VEGETABLES, JAMS, PRESERVES AND PICKLES | ABANDONED | — |
| 030 | MUESLI, CORNFLAKES, MAIZE FLAKES, CEREAL PREPARATIONS MAKE FROM WHEAT, CORN, OATS, BARLEY, RICE AND BRAN, YEAST, BISCUITS, PASTA, COFFEE SUBSTITUTES, SAUCES, EXCLUDING APPLE SAUCE AND CRANBERRY SAUCE, SPICES AND WHEATGERM | ABANDONED | — |
| 031 | UNPROCESSED CEREAL SEEDS, UNPROCESSED BRAN, UNPROCESSED CEREAL GRAINS, MALT, DOG BISCUITS AND FOODSTUFFS FOR ANIMALS | ABANDONED | — |
| 032 | MINERAL AND AERATED WATERS AND SOFT DRINKS AND SYRUPS USED IN THE PREPARATION OF SOFT DRINKS | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by ASSOCIATED FOODS LIMITED
- Other trademarks in Class 029
- Other trademarks in Class 030
- Other trademarks in Class 031
- Other trademarks in Class 032
- Similar marks named HEALTHY LIFE
- Prosecution event ABN2 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 6, 1992 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 23, 1992 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 11, 1991 | LOPT | LETTER OF PROTEST EVIDENCE FORWARDED | — |
| Sep 3, 1991 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 5, 1991 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 23, 1991 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 21, 1988 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 9, 1988 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 10, 1988 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 7, 1987 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 1, 1987 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 22, 1987 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 18, 1987 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 19, 1987 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 6, 1987 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 15, 1986 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 15, 1986 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 14, 1986 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 28, 1986 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 11, 1986 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 2, 1986 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 3, 1985 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 5, 1985 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |