Drawing for CHLORIDE

USPTO serial 73553725

CHLORIDE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 1456195Status 900
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Sep 8, 1987
Examiner
CIPPARONE, MARY
Law office
SCANNING ON DEMAND

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with CHLORIDE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

RICHARD W. YOUNG

RICHARD W YOUNG GARDNER, CARTON & DOUGLASSTE 3400 QUAKER TWR321 N CLARK STCHICAGO, IL 60610-4795

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009ELECTRIC CELLS AND ELECTRIC BATTERIES, CASES ADAPTED FOR ELECTRIC CELLS AND FOR ELECTRIC BATTERIES, ELECTRIC BATTERY CHARGERS, APPARATUS FOR SUPPLYING ELECTRIC POWER, FOR CONTROLLING THE SUPPLY OF ELECTRICITY AND FOR SPEED REGULATING, COMBINED ELECTRIC BATTERIES AND ELECTRIC BATTERY CHARGING APPARATUS, BEING AUTOMATICALLY OPERATED APPARATUS FOR SUPPLYING POWER; ELECTRIC TRANSFORMERS, VOLTAGE REGULATORS, ELECTRIC CURRENT METERS, VOLT METERS, ALARMS AND INDICATORS, ALL FOR USE IN INDICATING VARIATIONS IN THE CONDITIONS OF ELECTRIC CIRCUITS FROM PRE-SET CONDITIONS; RECTIFYING APPARATUS, INVERTERS, ILLUMINATED SIGNS, AND PARTS FOR ALL THE AFORESAID GOODSEXPIRED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 2, 2008ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Jun 13, 2008CAEXCANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9—
Mar 21, 2007CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Aug 30, 2006CORVREVIEW OF CORRESPONDENCE COMPLETE—
Jul 21, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Feb 5, 1993PR23POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 8 & 15—
Oct 26, 1992815FREGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) & SEC. 15 FILED—
Sep 8, 1987R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Jun 16, 1987PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
May 15, 1987NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Apr 27, 1987CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Apr 21, 1987CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED—
Apr 13, 1987CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 20, 1986CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
May 29, 1986CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 15, 1986CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 14, 1985CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 5, 1985DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 26, 1985CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance