Drawing for ANDREA'S GOURMET GOODIES

USPTO serial 73554171

ANDREA'S GOURMET GOODIES

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
COHN, DEBBIE
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with ANDREA'S GOURMET GOODIES?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

ANTHONY F. LO CICERO

ANTHONY F LO CICERO AMSTER, ROTHSTEIN & ENGELBERG90 PARK AVENEW YORK, NY 10016UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
029DRIED FRUITS AND NUTSABANDONEDSep 20, 1984
030CHOCOLATE, CAROB FLAVORED FRUITS AND NUTS, YOGURT FLAVORED FRUITS AND NUTS, AND CANDIESABANDONEDSep 20, 1984

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 16, 2024EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Sep 25, 1987EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Jun 26, 1987ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Jun 26, 1987EXPAEX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED—
Apr 1, 1987CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED—
Nov 26, 1986EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Aug 29, 1986CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
May 30, 1986CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 26, 1985CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance