USPTO serial 73554317
COMM+
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- —
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with COMM+?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
EAST SEATTLE, WA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
GLENN H. STEVENS
GLENN H STEVENS ROOM 14001314 DOUGLAS ON-THE-MALLOMAHA, NE 68102UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | CONSULTING, TECHNICAL ADVICE, MANAGEMENT, DESIGN, MAINTENANCE AND TESTING SERVICES IN THE FIELD OF COMMUNICATIONS AND COMPUTER NETWORKS; AND COMPUTER PROGRAMMING SERVICES PROVIDING TELECOMMUNICATIONS SERVICES NAMELY, CONSULTING, MANAGING, DESIGNING, MAINTAINING, TESTING, TECHNICAL ADVICE, A | ABANDONED | Jun 29, 1984 |
| 038 | ND PROVISION OF COMMUNICATIONS AND COMPUTER NETWORKS DESIGNING, TESTING, MAINTAINING AND ENGINEERING OF COMMUNICATIONS AND COMPUTER N | ABANDONED | Jun 29, 1984 |
| 042 | ETWORKS AND RELATED CONSULTING SERVICES | ABANDONED | Jun 29, 1984 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 2, 1986 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 11, 1985 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 7, 1985 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |