Drawing for MOISTURE PERFECT

USPTO serial 73554751

MOISTURE PERFECT

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 1391287Status 713
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Apr 29, 1986
Examiner
STRASER, RICHARD
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with MOISTURE PERFECT?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Christel Emerson

CHRISTEL EMERSON HENKEL CORPORATION2200 RENAISSANCE BLVD THE TRIAD, STEGULPH MILLS, PA 19406UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
003HAIR SHAMPOOS AND HAIR CONDITIONERSSECTION 18 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (ARAA): This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 20, 2004ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 20, 2004REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
May 26, 2004TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jun 25, 2003C18.CANCELLED SECTION 18-TOTAL—
Jun 25, 2003CANTCANCELLATION TERMINATED NO. 999999—
May 29, 2003CANGCANCELLATION GRANTED NO. 999999—
Jul 11, 2002PETCCANCELLATION INSTITUTED NO. 999999—
Jul 17, 19928.OKREGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTEDThe USPTO accepted your Section 8 declaration showing the mark is still in use in commerce (or excusable nonuse). This satisfies the six-year maintenance requirement and keeps the registration active until the next renewal deadline.
Apr 29, 19928.AFREGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) FILED—
Apr 29, 1986R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Apr 29, 1986R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Feb 4, 1986PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jan 5, 1986NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Dec 5, 1985CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Nov 29, 1985CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 6, 1985CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 4, 1985DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance