USPTO serial 73556273
O-KEY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- —
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with O-KEY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
DAVID M. PITCHER
DAVID M PITCHER STAAS & HALSEY1825 K ST N WWASHINGTON, DC 20006UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 032 | NON-ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGES, NAMELY FRUIT DRINKS, SOFT DRINKS, AND SYRUPS AND CONCENTRATES USED IN MAKING FRUIT JUICES AND SOFT DRINKS | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 26, 1988 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Oct 26, 1988 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Mar 23, 1988 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Dec 22, 1987 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Nov 20, 1987 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Oct 8, 1987 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 5, 1987 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 18, 1987 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 18, 1987 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 17, 1987 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 17, 1986 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 27, 1986 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 3, 1986 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 12, 1986 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 19, 1986 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 21, 1986 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 18, 1985 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |