USPTO serial 73559791
SNOBS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 601
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BRUCE, MARY FRANCES
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with SNOBS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
DAVID EHRLICH
DAVID EHRLICH WEISS DAWID FROSS ZELNICK & LEHRMAN PC633 THIRD AVENEW YORK, NY 10017-6703UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | NUTS, FRUITS AND VEGETABLES WITH A CRUNC | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 26, 1989 | ABN1 | ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED | — |
| Apr 3, 1989 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 9, 1989 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 15, 1988 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 14, 1988 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 24, 1988 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 7, 1988 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 25, 1987 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 27, 1987 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 30, 1986 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 7, 1986 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 15, 1986 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |