USPTO serial 73560339
LUNAR VACATIONS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- ZAK, HENRY
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with LUNAR VACATIONS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
TORONTO, ONTARIO, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
WILLIAM L. MATHIS
WILLIAM L MATHIS BURNS, DOANE, SWECKER & MATHISWASHINGTON AND PRINCE STS POB 1404THE GEORGE MASON BLDGALEXANDRIA, VA 22313-1404Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 020 | NOVELTY ITEM IN THE NATURE OF AN ITINERARY FOR A TRIP TO THE MOON | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 3, 1993 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 1, 1993 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 2, 1992 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 2, 1992 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 9, 1991 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 21, 1991 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 21, 1991 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 15, 1990 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 7, 1990 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 9, 1990 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 8, 1990 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 21, 1989 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 18, 1989 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 24, 1989 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 20, 1989 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 11, 1988 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 10, 1988 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 22, 1987 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 12, 1987 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 27, 1987 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 8, 1986 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 9, 1986 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 29, 1986 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 7, 1986 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |