Drawing for SUB-VENT

USPTO serial 73561122

SUB-VENT

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 1430996Status 900
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Mar 3, 1987
Examiner
ABATE CANDICE A
Law office
SCANNING ON DEMAND

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with SUB-VENT?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

FRED FLAM

PATRICK F BRIGHT BRIGHT & LORIG, PCSTE 3330633 W 5TH STLOS ANGELES, CA 90071

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
010DENTAL IMPLANTS AND ADAPTERS THEREFOREXPIREDAug 16, 1985

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 8, 2007CAEXCANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9
Oct 26, 2006CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS
Oct 3, 2006CORVREVIEW OF CORRESPONDENCE COMPLETE
Jul 1, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Feb 24, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Mar 3, 1993PR23POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 8 & 15
Nov 9, 1992815FREGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) & SEC. 15 FILED
Mar 3, 1987R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Dec 9, 1986PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Dec 9, 1986PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Nov 9, 1986NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
Jul 30, 1986CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
May 29, 1986ZZZZALLOWANCE/COUNT WITHDRAWN
Apr 24, 1986DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Apr 16, 1986DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Apr 3, 1986CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Jan 29, 1986CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 6, 1986DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance