USPTO serial 73562735
FRUIT OF NATURE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 1591586Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Apr 17, 1990
- Examiner
- SPARROW, MARY
- Law office
- SCANNING ON DEMAND
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with FRUIT OF NATURE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
OKLAHOMA CITY, OK
OKLAHOMA CITY, OK
OKLAHOMA CITY, OK
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
DAVID M. DAUK
DAVID M DAUK KWD PRODUCTS, INC2519 NW 23RD ST STE 101OKLAHOMA CITY, OK 73107UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | COSMETICS, NAMELY, SHAMPOO FOR THE HAIR, CONDITIONERS FOR THE HAIR, HAIR SPRAY FOR THE HAIR, STYLING SET FOR THE HAIR, LIQUIFYING CLEANSER FOR THE FACE, GENTLE WASH TO CLEANSE FACE AND BODY, FRESHENERS FOR THE FACE, MOISTURIZERS FOR THE FACE, NIGHT CREAM FOR THE FACE, LIFT POWDER FOR THE FACE, LIFT ACTIVATOR FOR THE FACE, BEAUTY DROPS FOR THE FACE, SOOTHING MASK FOR THE FACE, BODY LOTIONS FOR THE WHOLE BODY, BODY WASH TO CLEANSE THE BODY, FOOT OIL FOR THE FEET, FOOT WASH TO CLEANSE THE FEET, FOOT SPRAY TO FRESHEN THE FEET, FOOT CREAM TO MOISTURIZE THE FEET, PERFUMES AND COLOGNES FOR MEN AND WOMEN | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Dec 7, 1984 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 15, 2016 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Dec 4, 2008 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Feb 5, 2001 | RNL1 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Feb 5, 2001 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| Dec 11, 2000 | PR89 | RESPONSE RECEIVED TO POST REG. ACTION - SEC. 8 & 9 | — |
| Nov 14, 2000 | PR89 | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 8 & 9 | — |
| Mar 7, 2000 | 89AF | REGISTERED - COMBINED SECTION 8 (10-YR) & SEC. 9 FILED | — |
| Apr 11, 1997 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Apr 10, 1997 | PCGR | PETITION TO DIRECTOR GRANTED | — |
| Oct 15, 1996 | PCRC | PETITION TO DIRECTOR RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 4, 1996 | PR23 | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 8 & 15 | — |
| Mar 5, 1996 | 815F | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) & SEC. 15 FILED | — |
| Apr 17, 1990 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jan 8, 1990 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Dec 15, 1989 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Aug 17, 1988 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jul 25, 1988 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Mar 31, 1987 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Dec 16, 1986 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Nov 17, 1986 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Oct 15, 1986 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 30, 1986 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Aug 28, 1986 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 26, 1986 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 25, 1986 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 27, 1985 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 16, 1985 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |