USPTO serial 73562826
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
DAVID R. LAVANCE, JR.
DAVID R LAVANCE JR TRACHTMAN & LAVANCE1852 CENTURY PLSTE 130ATLANTA, GA 30345| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | COMPUTER PROGRAMS AND INTERFACE BETWEEN PERSONAL COMPUTER AND PHYSICAL MEASUREMENT DEVICES | ABANDONED | Jul 30, 1985 |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 20, 1987 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| May 20, 1987 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| May 15, 1987 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jun 23, 1986 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Feb 18, 1986 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jan 19, 1986 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Dec 20, 1985 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 20, 1985 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |