USPTO serial 73563220
SKOOTERS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- HOLTZMAN, TERRY
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with SKOOTERS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
BIRMINGHAM, AL
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
WOODFORD R. THOMPSON, JR.
WOODFORD R THOMPSON JR JENNINGS, CARTER, THOMPSON & VEAL1150 BANK FOR SAVINGS BLDGBIRMINGHAM, AL 35203UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | RESTAURANT SERVICES-NAMELY, DRIVE-IN RESTAURANTS | ABANDONED | Feb 11, 1984 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 25, 1989 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Feb 17, 1989 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Feb 17, 1989 | EXFB | EXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF | — |
| Apr 22, 1988 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Feb 25, 1988 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Feb 25, 1988 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Jul 24, 1987 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 2, 1987 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Jan 20, 1987 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 15, 1986 | ABN0 | ABANDONMENT - INCOMPLETE RESPONSE | — |
| Jul 24, 1986 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 3, 1986 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 9, 1986 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |