USPTO serial 73565042
SULBERG
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- —
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with SULBERG?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
MICHAEL J. STRIKER
MICHAEL J STRIKER360 LEXINGTON AVENEW YORK, NY 10017UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 006 | FORGINGS AND CASTINGS; EYE BOLTS AND EYE NUTS; BUILDING, FURNITURE, WINDOW AND DOOR FITTINGS; PIPING; PIPE COUPLINGS, ARMATURES AND FITTINGS FOR PIPING; VALVES; VALVE SEATS AND VALVE GUARDS FOR PLATE VALVES; METAL PARTS FOR CONTAINERS AND CONSTRUCTION SCAFFOLDING | ABANDONED | — |
| 007 | FINISHED, FORGED, CAST AND SHEET METAL PRTS FOR MACHINES, NAMELY, AGRICULTURAL MACHINES AND MECHANICALLY OPERATED IMPLEMENTS, IN PARTICULAR HARVESTING MACHINES, TRENCH MOWERS, MOTOR MOWERS, ATTACHED MOWERS, TURBO MOWERS, CUTTERBARS FOR MOWERS AND TREDDERS, IN PARTICULAR SINGLE OR MULTIPLE SICKLE GUARD FINGERS AND LEDGER PLATES FOR SICKLE GUARD FINGERS FOR MOWER, CONSTRUCTION MACHINES, MACHINES FOR THE METAL, WOOD AND PLASTIC PROCESSING, CHEMICAL AND MINING INDUSTRIES, MACHINE TOOLS, IN PARTICULAR THREAD CUTTING AND PIPE PROCESSING MACHINES, MEAT CHOPPING MACHINES AND MEAT MINCERS, IN PARTICULAR KNIFE PARTS, PRECUTTER PARTS AND PERFORATED DISCS, CRANES, CONSTRUCTION, LOAD AND PASSENGER ELEVATORS, COMPRESSORS, PUMPS, BOILERS, HEAT EXCHANGERS, MOTORS OTHER THAN FOR LAND, AIR AND WATER VEHICLES AND COUPLINGS FOR INDUSTRIAL MACHINES | ABANDONED | — |
| 008 | HAND OPERATED TOOLS, CONSISTING ESSENTIALLY OF BOX AXES, PLIERS AND WRENCHES, CONSISTING ESSENTIALLY OF ADJUSTABLE WRENCHES AND PIPE SPANNERS, FINISHED, FORGED, CAST AND SHEET METAL PARTS FOR HAND OPERATED TOOLS; CUTLERY | ABANDONED | — |
| 012 | FINISHED, FORGED, CAST AND SHEET METAL PARTS, FOR LAND, AIR AND WATER VEHICLES, IN PARTICULAR SUCH PARTS FOR SAID VEHICLES' TRANSMISSIONS, MOTORS, CHASSISSISSES, DOOR AND BODY HINGES, HINGES AND SIDE AND TAIL PANEL LOCKS FOR COMMERCIAL VEHICLES AND AGRICULTURAL TRAILERS, BRAKES, IN PARTICULAR FOR SUBWAYS, COUPLINGS, INN PARTICULAR TRAILER COUPLINGS, CARDAN SHAFTS, CLAMPING PARTS OF TRUCK RIMS, TRACKS FOR CATERPILLAR VEHICLES, STEERING PARTS, IN PARTICULAR FOR TRACTORS | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 7, 1988 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Oct 6, 1988 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| May 26, 1988 | EXFB | EXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF | — |
| Nov 30, 1987 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Nov 19, 1987 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Nov 17, 1987 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| May 12, 1987 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 10, 1987 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 3, 1987 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 27, 1987 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 9, 1987 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 20, 1986 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 9, 1986 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 29, 1986 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 29, 1986 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 17, 1986 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |