USPTO serial 73565872
WIZZ FIZZ
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- —
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with WIZZ FIZZ?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
NORTH FITZROY, VICTORIA, AU
NORTH FITZROY, VICTORIA, AU
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
LINDA L. BERKOWITZ
LINDA L BERKOWITZ LADAS & PARRY26 W 61ST STNEW YORK, NY 10023UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 030 | SUGAR CONFECTIONERY AND SHERBET | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 10, 1990 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Nov 6, 1990 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Nov 6, 1990 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Apr 27, 1990 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Feb 6, 1990 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jan 8, 1990 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Nov 27, 1989 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 9, 1989 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 18, 1989 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 24, 1988 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 24, 1988 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 26, 1988 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 1, 1988 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 15, 1987 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 26, 1987 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 5, 1987 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 6, 1987 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 2, 1987 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 3, 1986 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 2, 1986 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 8, 1986 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 7, 1986 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 29, 1986 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 29, 1986 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 13, 1986 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 9, 1986 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |