USPTO serial 73566147
SKYWALKER
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Aug 8, 1989
- Examiner
- SPARROW, MARY
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with SKYWALKER?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
TORONTO, ONTARIO, CA
TORONTO, ONTARIO, CA
TORONTO, ONTARIO, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
SUSAN T. BROWN
SUSAN T BROWN CUSHMAN, DARBY & CUSHMANNINTH FL1100 NEW YORK AVE N WWASHINGTON, DC 20005-3918Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 039 | AIRLINE PASSENGER SERVICES | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 12, 1996 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Aug 8, 1989 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| May 16, 1989 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 15, 1989 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Feb 21, 1989 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 17, 1988 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 22, 1988 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 20, 1988 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 11, 1988 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 23, 1988 | REIN | REINSTATED | — |
| May 13, 1988 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 30, 1987 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 24, 1987 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 4, 1987 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Jan 7, 1987 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 29, 1986 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 26, 1986 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 30, 1986 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 22, 1986 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |