USPTO serial 73566418
DOUBLE-BOND
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- WENDEL, HELEN R.
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with DOUBLE-BOND?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
DAVID P. PETERSEN
DAVID P PETERSEN KLARQUIST, SPARKMAN, CAMPBELL, ET AL1620 WILLAMETTE CTR121 S W SALMON STPORTLAND, OR 97204Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | VEHICLE CLEANING OR POLISHING PREPARATIONS, NAMELY, VEHICLE POLISH AND VEHICLE WAX PROTECTANT | ABANDONED | Sep 20, 1985 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 26, 1988 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Oct 26, 1988 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Mar 21, 1988 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Dec 22, 1987 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Nov 20, 1987 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Oct 22, 1987 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 16, 1987 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Sep 21, 1987 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 22, 1987 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 30, 1987 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 18, 1987 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 17, 1987 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 29, 1986 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 24, 1986 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 13, 1986 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |